Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Catalyst Collective


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 19:57, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

The Catalyst Collective

 * – (View AfD (View log  •  AfD statistics)

offshoot of the notable CrimethInc., but they, themselves, haven't done anything newsworthy yet. Hopefully nothing will get blown up now that I've said that. Pirate Argh!!1! 10:53, 7 December 2009 (UTC) Sorry, I hadn't finished the article - I'm new to wikipedia. Anyway, there's more info available for them like they participated in and helped supply the two week Feral Futures Call For Direct Action Camp in Summer 2009 (http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=20090416163631815) at the Piedra River in Southern Colorado, an event which hosted a stop on the Earth First! RoadShow's 2009 tour (http://colorado.indymedia.org/node/1730). I just ask that you guys keep the article up so it can be expanded on. It's a group of organizers not saboteurs so I doubt they'll be blowing anything up anytime soon, but I still think they're worth a couple paragraphs. While we're at it, I think Feral Futures deserves a page too, and Black Mesa Indigenous Support, but maybe I'm misunderstanding what is worthy of a wikipedia article. Anyway, I was going to continue expanding on this article, adding philosophy and such, which differs considerably from the overarching CrimethInc. group, but I guess I'll wait and see if it gets deleted before I do. Greenrevolutionary (talk) 18:01, 7 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greenrevolutionary (talk • contribs) 14:56, 7 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:15, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * There's a little bit of coverage here and something here  so perhaps they can be merged into the parent article. Polarpanda (talk) 11:33, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW ( Talk ) 03:13, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete This coincidentally-similar-to-my-username group doesn't appear notable, and it isn't covered in any reliable sources (Google only turns up self-published material and other uses of the name, there are no relevant news documents, and the only book sources refer to an organization from the 1970s.) As for the two sources mentioned by Polarpanda, both were published before the subject of the article was founded and therefore must be referring to different groups. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 04:02, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above and WP:ORG. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:04, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.