Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Catholic Thing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect (non-admin closure)  Snuggums ( talk  /  edits ) 16:24, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

The Catholic Thing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject of the article is not notable. ȸ (talk) 01:15, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  01:47, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  01:47, 20 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete No significant third party coverage. -- Fauzan  ✆ talk  ✉ mail  04:10, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Robert Royal (author). If it gets to be that enough is found for an article on the Thing (I must confess to having had a vision of a disembodied hand clutching a rosary when I saw the title), it can be revived. as it is, the RR article says it already. Peridon (talk) 10:24, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Support Peridon. An on-line magazine is effectively a website or blog and most are NN.  Peterkingiron (talk) 19:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Robert Royal (author). per Peridon.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:19, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. The Catholic Thing is a well-known online magazine and, thus, deserves an article in Wikipedia. --Checco (talk) 11:42, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.