Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Caves of Element


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 02:12, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

The Caves of Element

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Upgraded from prod due to previous CSD-G11 attempts, with creator removing templates. Fails WP:SPAM. Article states: "Although this article is created by the developers of the game, this article is in no way intended to promote this game, and should not be treated as one that does. This artcle is only intended to provide information about the upcoming game and inform the public about the company, BB." Fails WP:CRYSTAL, the game is not yet in production. Blatant violation of WP:COI. No GHits, no assertion of WP:NOTABILITY. GregJackP (talk) 14:36, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I'd have let the PROD go until if and when the author or someone else removed the template, but yeah, as the person who PROD'd this, I agree with all the nom's points. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ  bomb  19:51, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Spam for a game that doesn't exist yet, by a company that can't even be verified to exist. &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 00:43, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete — doesn't seem to assert significance (or anything that can easily be verified; it doesn't cite any sources) Cheers!☮ —Ecw.Technoid.Dweeb | contributions | talk 12:34, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.