Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Celebrity Source


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 20:44, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

The Celebrity Source

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Hopelessly promotional article created out of brief mentions, quotes, directories and primary sources. Even if two in-depth profiles stories existed to pass WP:CORP, any volunteer that has an interest in the subject would be better off starting from scratch. It is possible the founder may qualify for a page, which is a discussion for another time. CorporateM (Talk) 04:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:44, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:45, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:45, 10 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep The coverage is sufficient, and of sufficient quality, to meet WP:GNG. Problems with the article should not be dealt with through AfD. --MelanieN (talk) 04:02, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep I don't see how it doesn't meet our notability threshold. What can be fixed should not be deleted.  Jim Carter (from public cyber)  07:25, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.