Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Center for CosMedic Rejuvenation and Wellness


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 00:16, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

The Center for CosMedic Rejuvenation and Wellness
Advertisement, fails WP:CORP. mtz206 (talk) 01:13, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Advertisement, is non-notable. Ted 01:17, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is an advertisement. - Richardcavell 01:19, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * This is my first article so please let me know how to ammend it. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Awennar (talk • contribs)
 * I left a message on your talk page, Awennar. Aplomado  talk 01:58, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless it is of particular historical or other significance, it doesn't merit its own page. I would also recommend to the nominator a similar page, Paradise Day Spa and Bath House, which is essentially an ad despite its opening by the Mayor and assertions of historical importance. The problem is that there is simply nothing notable about this particular center which would merit inclusion in an encyclopaedia - see WP:NOT and WP:CORP if you are not quite familiar with policies. Maybe it will be significant one day, or maybe it is and needs to be rewritten to assert what it is that makes it so. But for now, it doesn't belong here. Jammo (SM247) 01:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I understand and thank-you to everyone for their guidance. It turns out that this business is notable as it will shortly be the first medical spa in the United Stated to become professionally accredited...I'll add this information and hopefully it will be helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Awennar (talk • contribs)
 * Being the first medical spa to become professionally accredited might create notability, but not until it actually happens. --mtz206 (talk) 02:22, 13 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Okay, I will verify if the accreditation has come thru or if this spa is still waiting for accreditation. Thanks Awennar 02:43, 13 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom. Accreditation wouldn't change this is an ad.  Tychocat 03:10, 13 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I took everything out of the article that may read as an advert. I'll check on the accreditation thing in the am. Awennar 05:42, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Here's the scoop They will be the first accredited spa in the US within the next month or so...which they believe will start a trend that will revolutionize the spa industry...that's all I got folks. Thanks again for the input. Awennar 22:36, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's no longer an ad, but it's still not notable. --Coredesat 07:50, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 'Delete, does not meet WP:CORP criteria for inclusion.--Isotope23 13:45, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Pilot| guy  15:36, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * delete as nn Adambiswanger1 19:42, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --דניאל - Dantheman531 21:41, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Accredited by whom? Fan1967 20:01, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Accredited by IMAPC (see article...there is a link). Apparently they are "the" accreditation organization for legal mail-order pharmacies and medical spas in the USA. They perform extrememly rigorous off- and on-site inspections depending on certain criteria.....Awennar 22:45, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * OK, let me get this straight. They're going to be accredited by an organization that accredits spas, but has never accredited a spa before? Fan1967 22:19, 18 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.