Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Center for Early Education


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) buffbills7701 02:00, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

The Center for Early Education

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of this school meeting notability guidelines. Being a private elementary school with unusually high tuition costs is not enough to merit notability and the statement "Since then the School has become regarded as one of the top elementary schools in the nation" is a fallacy. All of the references in the article are from the school's website and there is little to no mentioning of it in major education news sites and agencies. There are many other schools called "The Center of Early Education," none of which seem notable either. West Hollywood, California already mentions this school and the few content of this article can be added there if needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.3.52.87 (talk) 20:30, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - I completed the nom. ansh666 22:37, 7 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. The school is more exclusive than Harvard University!  Based on its tuition fees, it must be good!  But also there is secondary coverage, including this W Magazine article.  That article also refers to Los Angeles Times coverage.  It is significant and notable. -- do  ncr  am  23:46, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 8 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - Evidence of this school meeting notability guidelines. Not only does the W (magazine) article linked by doncram give significant coverage but Entertainment Weekly also gives in-depth coverage.   The nom, provided they are not a sock, needs to become familiar with WP:BEFORE and understand that the sources that happen to be in the article at a certain time usually do not represent all the sources that exist and they should look for sources before nominating.  --Oakshade (talk) 02:45, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep – This article meets the general notability guideline as a school. While it can be expanded a bit, a Google search produces a lot of results for this school. Epicgenius (talk) 12:39, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. As stated by the others, this is one of the best known (and most selective) private elementary schools in the West, as verified by sources like those cited by  and .  --Arxiloxos (talk) 14:37, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.