Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Central Modern School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as per unanimous positive consensus and the absence of calls for deletion outside of the nominator. A non-admin closure. And Adoil Descended (talk) 00:05, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

The Central Modern School

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

I cleaned up the page to remove unencyclopedic information. All remaining data is unreferenced and does not address notability standards Metao (talk) 03:46, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Secondary schools are generally considered notable. School obviously exists. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:04, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 11 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep – Per Notability (high schools) and WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:01, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Verified secondary schools are generally held to be notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:20, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * KeepThe school obviously meets Notability (high schools).Also i have added some links on the article given by Colapeninsula and a few more.Ayanosh (talk) 07:10, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * , you just cited an essay as if it were a guideline. If you weren't aware of that, please make yourself aware by reading something before you cite it.  Ol Yeller21  Talktome  18:37, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I had read the essay ,I did not know that you can not use them in a discussion. since they "represent widespread norms or minority viewpoints".Thank you for pointing out out the mistake.But still the school meets WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES.Ayanosh (talk) 05:27, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * You can use them in a discussion. You just have to be aware that they don't have equal status to guidelines. They're still valuable pointers to usage on Wikipedia. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:02, 16 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - We keep high schools for the very good reason that experience shows that, with enough research, sources can invariably be found that meet WP:ORG. Google is a very poor tool for finding sources on Indian schools because, unlike US schools, they don't dump everything on the Internet. Indeed, very few have much of an Internet presence at all. We must avoid systemic bias and allow time for local sources to be researched since no evidence has been adduced that this school cannot meet notability requirements. TerriersFan (talk) 15:14, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - I would suggest that the merge proposal at Talk:Barasat is also flawed. Experience shows that a standalone page encourages article development. TerriersFan (talk) 15:20, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.