Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Centre for Corporate Public Affairs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:44, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

The Centre for Corporate Public Affairs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. Fails notability; checked Google (lots of hits, all advertising/promotion), Google Books (nothing), Google News (nothing), and Google News Archive (nothing). Page created in 2008 and recently re-vamped but still has no sources provided. Corporate promotion with material lifted directly from organization website (copyvios removed). Possible COI from recent editors. Loopy30 (talk) 12:37, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 12:52, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

https://books.google.com.au/books?id=ddHUDAAAQBAJ&pg=PT39&dq=accpa&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=accpa&f=false, and http://about.abc.net.au/speeches/annual-corporate-public-affairs-oration/, and http://www.communitybusinesspartnership.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/giving_australia_2016_literature_review.pdf, and https://probonoaustralia.com.au/news/2017/09/australians-giving-time-not-money/, and https://books.google.com.au/books?id=Wtu2AAAAIAAJ&q=accpa&dq=accpa&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y, and https://www.ceda.com.au/CEDA/media/ResearchCatalogueDocuments/PDFs/15372-spp2013.pdf, and https://probonoaustralia.com.au/news/2016/12/australian-businesses-go-beyond-giving/, and http://www.couriermail.com.au/business/queensland-business-monthly-silverchef-bhp-flight-centre-recognise-importance-of-philanthropy/news-story/6cabc1f45950b8ef460088311ee5a918
 * Comment: I don't really think that all of the Google results are promotions. Some of them are independent of the source, like https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238277666_Re-examining_corporate_community_investment_Allen%27s_Australian_Centre_for_Corporate_Public_Affairs_ACCPA_corporate_community_involvement_report EMachine03 (talk) 13:04, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: My Google search seemed to find quite reliable sources, like:
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 13:18, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 13:18, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades of Godric On leave 03:48, 30 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: It would be nice to get more than one !vote.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Onel 5969  TT me 01:59, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Of the sources given, only this represents significant coverage. We need multiple such sources in order to satisfy WP:ORG and write a balanced article, but I can't find any others.--Pontificalibus (talk) 07:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - lack of independent reliable sources, appears to be promotional (and self-created given similarities between original content and subject’s own website). Shelbystripes (talk) 23:22, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.