Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cheetah Girls tours (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 02:47, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

The Cheetah Girls tours
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Little to indicate notability, not to mention a complete lack of sources. Rwiggum (Talk /Contrib ) 21:12, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:42, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Set list, largely unsourced. The coding has at least improved since the last afd. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 21:53, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom sourcing issues have not been addressed since the conclusion of previous discussions. coccyx bloccyx  (toccyx)  22:36, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge into The Cheetah Girls (recording artists). Unfortunately, "poorly sourced" isn't an accepted reason for deletion, and I don't think the information in this article is unsourceable. Most of it is simply unnecessary. I stand in opposition to tour schedules and setlists, and think that they fall under WP:NOT. I clearly represent a minority opinion there, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong. Strip the tour schedules and setlists out, and the remaining information will fit nicely into the parent article.&mdash;Kww(talk) 20:33, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I agree that tour schedules are not necessary in tour articles (just a general description of where they played and in what type of venues), but setlists (for those tours with fixed ones) are important, just as tracklistings for albums are important.  A concert performance is an artistic work, and the inclusion and ordering of songs is the key element of that.   Wasted Time R (talk) 22:32, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. No worse than most of the rubbish in Wikipedia. 125.255.16.233 (talk) 05:33, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Other Stuff Exists is not a valid reason for a keep vote. Rwiggum  (Talk /Contrib ) 10:15, 26 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.