Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Chelsea Pig


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 07:23, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

The Chelsea Pig

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet WP:NCORP. Seems to be a WP:MILL bar/restaurant. Most of the refs are interviews with a new owner, and thus not independent. The MyLondon article is the best source, but that is routine local coverage in the food section and even that is mostly based on an interview. Not seeing enough for WP:GNG. MB 17:15, 25 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep, per recent accolade. Seasider53 (talk) 17:44, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure that's significant coverage. Lots of restaurants get reviewed and the recent article looks to be about that calibre.  FalconK (talk) 05:44, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:20, 2 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  04:56, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. MB 17:15, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MB 17:15, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:20, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:20, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. I was very fond of this place when I lived in London back in the 1980s but I couldn't find substantive WP:RS media coverage, under either the present name or the old "Pig's Ear" name, that would support a claim of notability. Fiachra10003 (talk) 07:04, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. It is indeed run of the mill; nothing to establish notability in 130 years.  News search turns up basically nothing.  FalconK (talk) 05:44, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient notability. Perhaps this will be a stat to more realistic standards for restaurant aticles."restaurant of the week " is an absurd basis for notability.  DGG ( talk ) 06:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.