Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Chestnut King


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:10, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

The Chestnut King

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No worthy content. It mentions that the books exists, but nothing more. Night of the Big Wind (talk) 19:21, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment That this article is currently only a stub is no reason to delete it. RichardOSmith (talk) 19:38, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 12:24, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep no content is not a reason to delete, and the author and his work appear notable, Sadads (talk) 13:34, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. There is a significant number of blog reviews, some may fail WP:RS but they all were independent, and being part of notable trilogy (with the first book already lined up for a film adaptation) makes this article the more valid, unless the idea is to cover all three books in one single article (which I don't think would be convenient) - frankie (talk) 00:38, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.