Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Chimera Vector (novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Article Userfied. To be returned to mainspace if and when more sources become available. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:42, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

The Chimera Vector (novel)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is a book that is set to be published in a little more than a month. Doing a quick search, I was unable to find anything that connotes notability. To note, Pan Macmillan is an Australian publisher - and Momentum is an E-book only publishing house, with some publications on demand. I have a few questions on the author as well, but I would prefer to leave that for a separate AFD if it comes up. --  Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 05:33, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. I did a major cleanup of the article, as it was highly promotional in tone. It used primary sources for sources and had a "reception section" that was mostly full of unreliable sources such as facebook and blogs. There were three usable sources, which I added into the article. I think it might be WP:TOOSOON, though. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:08, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. Thank you for improving the article I created, I've learned a lot from your edits. If this does end up being WP:TOOSOON due to lack of independent reviews, I'll let this one go and consider recreating the article at a later time if there is sufficient coverage in multiple reliable sources. Willing to hear what other users think though. Zippy2012 (talk) 09:57, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. I recommend you put it in your own user space e.g. User:Zippy2012/The Chimera Vector (novel) then you can work on it there and if has been reviewed or substantially covered by some reliable sources you add them to the article and then move it back to article space. SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 19:32, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:36, 25 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment. I second SpeakFree's suggestion. ~dee  ( talk? ) 13:37, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'm not opposed to userfication of the article for improvement. TG, you're right, it is definitely a case of WP:TOOSOON.  Zippy, we really appreciate your understanding on this one, either way it goes. =^_^= -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 03:14, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete or Userify as WP:TOOSOON. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:50, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. Userified to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Zippy2012/The_Chimera_Vector_%28novel%29 Zippy2012 (talk) 15:36, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.