Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Chinese Buffet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:00, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

The Chinese Buffet

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Declined speedy onn the grounds that there is 'some press coverage'; however almost any business of this kind will get some press. It's called PR, or local newspapers desperate to print something. IMO this is non-notable, and a look at what google comes up with does not persuade me otherwise; run-of-the -mill listings coverage. TheLongTone (talk) 15:13, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  Vipinhari  &#124;&#124;  talk  15:22, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Vipinhari  &#124;&#124;  talk  15:22, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Vipinhari  &#124;&#124;  talk  15:22, 7 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: There are a couple of passing mentions in a Highbeam search, some more similar on Google, but the most substantial information that I can see is on a company press release (which obviously doesn't meet WP:RS). Nothing there indicates that this is more than a firm with expansion plans, but not meeting WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 16:25, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep I found two newspaper reviews of two of the restaurants for secondary sources and added them to the article. I also expanded it just a bit to mention the cuisine, added a category and a wikilink. My !vote is weak because I'm leaning a bit toward thinking the article has been created a bit too soon for the chain to meet notability standards. I did find the two newspaper articles, and, both of which were published just last month, about two of the chain's restaurants. At the same time, I'm leaning toward it being too soon to sweep this one into deletion just yet. The article is very new, but there are a few signs already to suggest notability. This is not, to my mind, a really clear cut example of yet another completely non-notable and completely unsourceable (is that a word?) restaurant chain. Thus my ambivalence. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 18:52, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:51, 7 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as searches found nothing better. SwisterTwister   talk  06:39, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Aside from passing mentions and reviews, there's nothing out there about The Chinese Buffet. Elaenia (talk) 05:58, 9 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.