Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Chinese Historical Review


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:22, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

The Chinese Historical Review

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:DEL8: Not notable, does not meet WP:NJOURNALS or WP:GNG. This publication should not be confused with Chinese Historical Review, which is a notable journal. DferDaisy (talk) 16:14, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 16:53, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 16:53, 18 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete, no sources (apart from two non-linked sources in Chinese that I cannot read), not indexed anywhere. Also rather promotional, borderline G11. --Randykitty (talk) 18:42, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article makes no claim of significance, promotional. Szzuk (talk) 17:52, 25 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.