Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Christian Post


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy Keep - nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure) Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 06:09, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

The Christian Post

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unsourced and contains no assertion of notability. List of "references" is just a collection of links to Christian websites with no internal citations. Not encylopedic. SuaveArt (talk) 03:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - the Christian Post actually *is* notable, with quite a significant reach among US evangelicals and a high profile. Of course there is no question that the article fails to demonstrate this notability. Thparkth (talk) 03:20, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Both google scholar and google news turn up enough here to indicate this subject passes WP:N with flying colors. Deletion is not clean up, and not having sources is not a valid deletion reason.  WP:BEFORE needs to be done as due diligence before nominating for deletion.  -- Jayron  32  03:29, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. I wasn't sure based on the content. I'm changing the header to a request for sources. This nomination can be closed.--SuaveArt (talk) 03:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep per afd withdraw from SuaveArt. Please do WP:BEFORE before engaging the afd process.  Edward Vielmetti (talk) 05:59, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.