Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Christmas Heart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 15:49, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

The Christmas Heart

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No references added. Charming.wiki (talk) 04:04, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Weak delete . No references do suggest that this fails Notability (films). Ping me if references are added so I can revise my vote if needed. PS. Ping User:Charming.wiki: Nominators should notify the authors (User talk:Johnnyappleseedplease) about deletions of their articles; please don't forget that, and fix that - thanks. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:38, 9 November 2013 (UTC) PPS. Seems rescued with good refs. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  14:03, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't really understand the rationale for deleting, but looking around the intertubes, I'm seeing a good number of sources that discuss this film in some detail. I'm at a weak keep right now, but I think this article can be drastically improved. Remember, the started for notability is not that the sources are in the article but that they exist. Ego White Tray (talk) 04:39, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. I was pretty surprised at what I found, but I will say that I had to dig pretty hard for them. I'd probably count the two Cleveland.com sources as primary since they were written by a newspaper that employs the script's writer- and the Comcast source should probably be primary as well, but the rest are independent of the film. There are a few reviews out there (surprised to find the one from the CFDb) and some articles about the film's production. It's not the strongest sourcing I've ever done, but there's just enough out there to squeak by notability guidelines for films. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:54, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep For what it is, a Hallmark Channel Christmas movie out of many, TG79 found good sources and the film passed just enough notability that it should be kept.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 09:30, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:20, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:20, 10 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep as passes GNG - →Davey 2010→ →Talk to me!→  01:02, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.