Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Christmas TV Companion: a Guide to Cult Classics, Strange Specials & Outrageous Odditites


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 15:10, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

The Christmas TV Companion: a Guide to Cult Classics, Strange Specials & Outrageous Odditites

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

This article is such blatant self promotion that notable or not we would be better off deleting it. All the sources cited are book reviews, many of which are from websites that do not appear to be reliable sources. The two major contributors appear to be the author: User:CFOWriter and the publisher Dominic Caruso: User:Dominic in ohio. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:39, 23 October 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Weak delete. This is a borderline case. There are few sources, the majority of which are regional press. I think it very nearly reaches the criteria at WP:BOOK, but falls short.--hkr Laozi speak  06:57, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.