Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Chronicles of Dekaydence


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:56, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

The Chronicles of Dekaydence

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable book series. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:46, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. If kept, should be redirected to and merged with Susie Cornfield.  The Uninvited Co., Inc. 17:38, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 27 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 01:25, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Comment It might be useful to note that the Susie Cornfield AFD was closed as delete. If the author is not notable, it is likely this series is also not notable.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:25, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 00:29, 14 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. I couldn't find anything that suggests that this is a notable book series. Any ghits that came back linked to author/publisher sources or to blogs that wouldn't be considered reliable sources. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:40, 14 November 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79


 * Delete - Doesn't seem notable at all to me. And the fact that the authour's page was deleted says a lot about the notability of the books, too. --Madison-chan (talk) 21:38, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Madison-chan


 * Delete According to Worldcat,  Cornfield is not a notable author; and this book is not even listed there, while her two previous books in the series are in only 6 or 7 libraries each. WorldCat is not an esoteric database; it's as easy to use as google, and for things like this, it gives much more information.   DGG ( talk ) 05:26, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.