Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Chronicles of Fatena


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 00:11, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

The Chronicles of Fatena

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested prod-book that has yet to come out by a author who has yet to write anything and is being speedied as well. Wgolf (talk) 19:50, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I can find no coverage at all in published independent reliable sources, and no indication that this book meets WP:NBOOK -- ℕ  ℱ  20:11, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. This is a case of TOOSOON at the very least. Primefac (talk) 20:14, 21 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete, no indication of notability, no published reviews (beyond user-submitted Goodreads reviews that don't help). I tried looking for Arabic sources since the book is written in Arabic and targeted at Arab audiences, but I didn't find any helpful Arabic references either. Huon (talk) 23:56, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 22 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. I can't find any coverage to show that this book is ultimately notable. On the talk page the original editor asserts that this has received some coverage in social media and the like because its subject matter prevented it from being published, but I can't see where that has translated into any coverage for the book either. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:50, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete There does not seem to be WP:RS that shows that this subject passes WP:GNG. At best the reason is that it is WP:TOOSOON. Either way delete. --Jersey92 (talk) 21:10, 24 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.