Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Chronicles of Rick Roll


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 10:16, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

The Chronicles of Rick Roll

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I'm not sure if this is notable- the movie is only in concept and still being shopped. Except for some Teaser Trailers, it does not yet exist. Is this considered advertising? I suggest removing the article until it has at least started principle photography. Wkharrisjr (talk) 15:30, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Film hasn't commenced principle photography. Delete. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ  bomb  17:26, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 11 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON. To quote the article "According to CNN, these trailers are made up of concept footage shot in hopes of securing studio backing for a major motion picture." So we do not have a film in production... we have concept footage being shopped in hopes of seeking backing.  Further, we do not even have enough persistant and in-depth coverage to merit it as even a possible exception to WP:NF.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 18:41, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. As  ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ  bomb  notes above the usual time to start an article on a notable commercial film is at the commencement of principle photography.  (Low-budget and/or independent films that don't have saturation marketing should indeed often wait for an actual release.)  This film has not even been green-lit yet.  It is just an idea (and maybe a script).More importantly it lacks coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources.  Eluchil404 (talk) 08:44, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.