Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Chronicles of Riddick 3: Return To Furya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 03:10, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

The Chronicles of Riddick 3: Return To Furya

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article seems to be pure crystal balling. A google search for "Return to Furya" turned up only 5 hits out of which 2 were references to this article and 2 seems to be posts in a message board. I could not find any official mention of this movie anywhere. Nbala13 17:43, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete looks like someone is practicing reading their tea leaves. --Haemo 22:43, 11 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. There is not even a year mention for the release.--JForget 22:44, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. A bit of research points to an article on comingsoon.net wherein the blogger had run into Diesel, and there are apparently two more films under development - but the blurb in this blog (which quotes Diesel) didn't go into much more other than that he and Twohy are indeed working on two more films.  As such, speculation about plotlines are little more than crystalballery, and should be disposed of. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 00:26, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per obvious WP:CRYSTAL... there's nothing here, vanquish ASAP. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 03:52, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Oh, if only there was a WP:Not#Wikipedia_is_not_IMDB. In any case, the crystal ball argument certainly applies here, as the movie is not out yet, and can't be reliably sourced. spazure 09:01, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - This appears to be more of someone's personal hopes. I don't see a single citation even suggesting this film is being talked about. When I did a search, there appears to be only speculation that they are going to make another, and no word from officials. IMDb doesn't even list it, so that has to tell you something there, as they list any future film that gets talked about in the press.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  14:12, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Not to rain on the parade, but WP:CRYSTAL - which you have pretty much cited - is not a CSD criterion. Sorry. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 03:47, 14 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.