Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Chronicles of Spellborn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was DELETE. -Docg 11:10, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

The Chronicles of Spellborn

 * — (View AfD)

Advert for a non-notable unreleased game. CiaranG 17:01, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Note Multiple accounts who contributed to this AfD are suspected confirmed sockpuppets per Requests for checkuser/Case/Infomanager. ~ trialsanderrors 07:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - as per nom. Reads like an advert. Ronbo76 17:43, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete at least until it's released or near to being. At the moment the publisher is listed as "unknown". Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:54, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Koweja 19:38, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per WP:CSD, specifically G11 (blatant advertising). The article was created by a user named Freeze tcos (TCOS = The Chronicles of Spellborn) with exactly five contributions within an hour and a half: Two updates to the article itself, uploading an image for the logo, and adding information about the game to List of MMORPGs and Massively multiplayer online first-person shooter. Lankybugger 20:12, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete until the game is released or a publisher is announced. Alan Shatte 21:53, 4 January 2007 (UTC) &larr; See checkuser request on this user. ~ trialsanderrors 07:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep I am not convinced that it is an advertisement. The game has many articles at IGN PC, the latest being dated in October. Gamerankings lists 6 previews  from notable websites like GameSpot, 1UP, and IGN. Jessica Anne Stevens 22:28, 4 January 2007 (UTC)  &larr; See checkuser request on this user. ~ trialsanderrors 07:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I would change to Keep if rewritten by a neutral editor.  (I might do it if I have extra free time, but don't hold your breath.)  Although game is probably notable enough, the current version of the article has WP:COI issues. --Alan Au 05:13, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * As I wrote in your talk page, if you need help with this let me know. Jessica Anne Stevens 06:04, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep the article doesn't claim anything extraordinary that would make the COI issues larger than its notability. Paul D. Meehan 05:47, 5 January 2007 (UTC) &larr; See checkuser request on this user. ~ trialsanderrors 07:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Paul and others. Gisele Hsieh 20:23, 5 January 2007 (UTC) &larr; See checkuser request on this user. ~ trialsanderrors 07:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Everything besides the author seems okay. Other Wikipedians have shown interest in helping with the article, so it has some merit besides being a vanity/promotional piece. Brad Guzman 20:32, 5 January 2007 (UTC) &larr; See checkuser request on this user. ~ trialsanderrors 07:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Brad's reasoning. It seems pointless to remove an article just to rewrite a substantially similar version. Not to mention that doing so will probably just result in a AfD nomination Alan Shatte 21:35, 5 January 2007 (UTC) &larr; See checkuser request on this user. ~ trialsanderrors 07:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Encyclopedic article, about notable software. Joel Jimenez 04:25, 6 January 2007 (UTC) &larr; See checkuser request on this user. ~ trialsanderrors 07:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as a notable MMORPG that's received attention from various sources. Tarinth 10:17, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.