Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Church of Lazlo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:11, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

The Church of Lazlo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. Poorly sourced article about a local radio program on a single radio station in a single market. This is not a claim of notability that passes WP:NMEDIA, which requires something approaching national distribution -- but the only other path for something like this to get a Wikipedia article is to be sourced well enough to satisfy WP:GNG. The sourcing here doesn't do that, however; four of the five sources are to internal radio industry trade magazines of the type that routinely cover comparable news about any radio program that exists at all, and thus don't demonstrate that this one is more notable in any way than the thousands of other similar programs that exist in the world -- and the only one that actually represents reliable source coverage in real media was written by a person who's directly affiliated with the program and thus isn't independent. All of which means GNG has not been met. Bearcat (talk) 16:48, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:NMEDIA. Thin coverage in secondary sources.  Magnolia677 (talk) 17:28, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  16:50, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:30, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:30, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:37, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PROMO with a good dose of WP:TNT; strictly an advertorial page and blatantly so. No indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:39, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:39, 27 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.