Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Circus Card Trick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Johnleemk | Talk 04:50, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

The Circus Card Trick
Delete. Not-notable card trick with arbitrary title. We don't need an article for every slight/illusion in which a magician locates a spectator's card. The "key" or "locator" method (by which the trick is accomplished) is used in countless tricks. -- Krash 17:52, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge into new article, perhaps Key card (card trick) or some similar title?... and then redirect, because I agree with nom that we don't need an article for every Key card variant. One article that had lots of the presentations as sections might be a much better article. (Reading The Cards might be another candidate article to merge/redirect?) Key card is an important mechanic and deserves an article, along with forcing... That said I wonder if this should have been AfDed, if instead merging should have just been carried out? ++Lar: t/c 19:50, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree with you to a point. "Key card" is listed at List of conjuring terms. I think it would be difficult to write an entire article about it. Perhaps a merge of the term into Card magic would be better. I don't agree with mentioning the specific trick anywhere (or even keeping the page) because the name of the trick is arbitrary; most magicians wouldn't know what "The Circus Card Trick" is since names of card tricks aren't really standardized. -- Krash 20:06, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * n.b....Reading The Cards (another nn card trick that – I feel – should be AfDed) is a variation on the "one-ahead" method, mentioned at billet reading and on the conjuring list. But that's another talk page. -- Krash 20:15, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep or rename. This is some good content. Cyde Weys votetalk 00:05, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as this is a reasonable article. I will also accept a merge into Card magic. Stifle 23:17, 16 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.