Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cloudland Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Peter Tolan. Which content will be merged is, of course, at the discretion of the editor who preforms the merge; however, with the outcome of this AfD, I'd recommend being very selective. (non-admin closure) Kharkiv07  ( T ) 13:44, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

The Cloudland Company

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a company which does not meet WP:GNG or WP:CORP. Searches bring up some youtube videos but I cannot find any coverage in any other sense. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 23:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 23:41, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 23:41, 12 February 2016 (UTC)


 * merge to Peter Tolan, since it did exist. But it looks like it was indeed a minor stunt, since it is not mentioned in his bio article. Staszek Lem (talk) 01:18, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:08, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge as this seems best considering it's questionably independently notable. SwisterTwister   talk  06:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:28, 19 February 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:G5. The page's creator,, is a confirmed sockpuppet of , who was blocked before he created this page with that sock and defended it with two others ( and ). Nearly all of the article's substance was written by him: compare his original submission with the article as it now stands. If the cleanup edits by others are enough to take this out of G5 territory, it's only by a hair, and the reasons given in the nomination ought to tip the scale in favor of delete. Moreover, I see nothing worth merging. —  Rebbing    talk   05:36, 28 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.