Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Collapse (song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Home School Valedictorian. --BDD (talk) 21:31, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

The Collapse (song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSONG Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:44, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The AfD should be cancelled as the reached No. 33 on the Alternative Songs chart at http://www.billboard.com/artist/278041/adelitas-way/chart?f=377. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:51, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 18 October 2013 (UTC)


 * If that's all that can be found about the song, it can be redirected to Home School Valedictorian. -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 01:56, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm sure more can be found, not that it will be found. However that is enough to merit an article based on WP:SONGS, even though the position on a minor chart isn't particularly strong. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:09, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually, WP:NSONGS doesn't say that. It says that charting is a factor that may make a song notable, bu a standalone article should exist only if the song is "the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label" and "there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article". Neither of those apply here. These more important parts of the notability requirements alway seem to be overlooked. -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 18:20, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Good call. I have been misreading that. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:49, 20 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:11, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 21:32, 6 November 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.