Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Comeback (2015 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. General consensus to keep; the article has been at AfD for a while now and there has been no other input from editors to suggest anything other than keep. (non-admin closure) st170e talk 00:59, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

The Comeback (2015 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable film. Existence does not equal notability. No refs, and I could find none independently (searching was complicated by the film's title). What I found was IMDB (no independence), blogs (not reliable), and some promotional information. KDS4444 (talk) 11:31, 22 November 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment. I found two short reviews:  from the Philippine Daily Inquirer and  from The Philippine Star.  I used to be better at finding Southeast Asian reliable sources, but I'm somewhat out of practice.  I might be able to dig up more later. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:42, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:00, 29 November 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Well, I'm not sure how good of a source this is, but I found this video chat at ABS-CBN. There's also this review from ABS-CBN.  Like the other two, it's pretty short.  I think they're probably long enough to satisfy WP:NFILM, which says capsule reviews don't count.  It'd be nice to hear some comments about the sources that I've found. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:23, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:45, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. I guess nobody's going to comment on the sources.  The reviews are short, but I think they're still in the acceptable range for WP:NFILM.  If I can find this much coverage, I'm pretty sure there's more that a native speaker could find.  Three English-language reviews is pretty good for an independent film from the Philippines. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:20, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:56, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:56, 10 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. I've inlined the reference to one review from a major media source, and added another. Reviews in major media = notability. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 22:23, 12 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.