Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Comic Book Syndicate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 06:25, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

The Comic Book Syndicate

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable local cable show. Also has an online presence, but its notability online is not established. References establish nothing more than local notability. Hairhorn (talk) 03:08, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Provisional Delete given the lack of appropriate sources in the article's current form. Several of the links at the bottom point to small news sites which either do not have, or no longer have, reference to this topic.  I'm putting "provisional" in my opinion since I'm open to the concept that an airing television program, even a small one on local TV, is theoretically notable, although obviously the modern equivalent of cable-access programming would almost never pass notability.  Get some real sources and I'd be more than happy to change to a keep.  No stronger sources, no further evidence of notability beyond simple assertion = delete, per wikipedia's guidelines. -Markeer 15:09, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:17, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:44, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No notability found and the article is written as self-promotion.  Want to speedy this one.... -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 03:47, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - lacks any claims for notability. No prejudice on recreating it if notability can be shown but I'd recommend working on this in the sandbox and drop a note in WT:CMC for opinions on whether it is up to scratch. (Emperor (talk) 19:53, 3 September 2009 (UTC))
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.