Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Compact (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:01, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

The Compact
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Deleted at last AfD, in 2006, when our standards were much lower. Boleyn (talk) 08:35, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  ~ Amkgp  💬  17:39, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  ~ Amkgp  💬  17:39, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  ~ Amkgp  💬  17:39, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amkgp  💬  17:39, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Bizarre two different things on one page! One not meeting gng and the other not even referenced!!! Davidstewartharvey (talk) 17:52, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with Davidstewartharvey: this should be two articles, but the first wouldn't pass GNG, while the second would need to be nuked and rebuilt as Compact (UK government) or something similar - and even then, it would probably fail WP:DICDEF. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 08:10, 29 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.