Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Complete Monument & Columbia Album Collection


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sources provided show notability and consensus is that the compilation is acceptable. (non-admin closure) --  Dane talk  07:28, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

The Complete Monument & Columbia Album Collection

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Most of the albums in the article are on Wiki already, and if they have unreleased tracks or an extra CD containing unreleased songs, they should be added to their respective album page as a second track listing

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:



Jennica ✿ / talk 13:34, 2 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - while WP:INHERITED means albums cannot always have independent notability of the artist, general consensus is that compilations released by a major label covering a notable artist with many hits are usually acceptable. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  16:06, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - The Kristoffersen compilation actually has quite a few independent sources:   . There are more but I think these examples get my point across.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 17:29, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * That fourth source is not independent; it is a press release by the record label. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 20:25, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:03, 2 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.