Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Con Man (novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:11, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

The Con Man (novel)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

May fail Notability (books). magnius (talk) 14:27, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The book's author could be considered historically significant per Bibliography of Evan Hunter, but it appears this particular work fails to meet any of the other notability requirements. I realize Notability (books) says "a book is generally notable if it verifiably meets through reliable sources one or more of the following criteria," but is one really enough if it's the least significant requirement of all? LiteraryMaven (talk • contrib) 18:57, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 16:11, 4 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Not enough 3rd party reliable sources to sufficiently establish notability Nja 247 12:08, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.