Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Concept of Polymediality


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Marios Joannou Elia. The Bushranger One ping only 01:10, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

The Concept of Polymediality

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a book, which just states that it exists while failing to demonstrate any reason why its existence would be noteworthy. This was initially started as a straight copyvio of the book's sales profile on the website of its own publisher, thus suggesting that the intent here was advertorial rather than encyclopedic, and was then restubbed to its current form. And the only source here is a single directory entry in a library system, which is a routine type of source that any book in existence could always show. A book does not automatically pass WP:NBOOK just because it's nominally verifiable as existing -- it needs to be shown as the subject of reliable source coverage in media, not just to have a directory entry in a library catalogue. Bearcat (talk) 23:21, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Marios Joannou Elia. A case of WP:TOOSOON, but there's a clear redirect target. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 19:01, 8 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.