Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Concubine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. NawlinWiki 01:35, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

The Concubine

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Nonnotable band. Gives a couple of sources, but I don't think they meet WP:RS. Contested speedy. NawlinWiki 13:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Given MrFizyx's sources below, it wouldn't bother me if this was kept. Leaving on here for further discussion, though. NawlinWiki 19:20, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - not enough sources to meet WP:BAND; no evidence of multiple non-trivial coverage in independent sources. Only external links are to their own sites and MySpace. Delete unless more sources can be found. Walton monarchist89 14:54, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - sources have now been provided which should be adequate per WP:BAND. Walton monarchist89 19:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think they just make it.  I found a couple of album reviews  and one writer's list of "Ten Of Metal's Best Kept Secrets " (they top the list). -MrFizyx 00:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * They also rate a |CONCUBINE&sql=11:0sngtq4zcu48~T0 page at the All Music Guide. -MrFizyx 14:53, 23 February 2007 (UTC)


 * UPDATE: The article is now reasonably well-sorced. Someone familiar with the band could use the added sources to expand this into a pretty good article. -MrFizyx 19:10, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.