Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Confessionals


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star  Mississippi  02:39, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

The Confessionals

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not notable. Vanity page for ancient web relic. Solemn1 (talk) 19:38, 4 August 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:21, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Popular culture, Social science, Internet, Websites, United States of America,  and Ohio. &mdash;  Karnataka  talk  21:44, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Found this 2021 ref https://thesophian.com/so-why-is-the-smith-confessional-still-popular-on-campus/. No strong opinion either way. - Indefensible (talk) 16:11, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Perhaps this innocuous bit of dryer lint of an idea will spark some inferno of Wiki politics, but I question whether I should have listed this article for Proposed Deletion to begin with. Since Proposed Deletion results in a deletion if there are no objections, and there are no objections here, perhaps it should be deleted. • the solemn one (talk) 23:49, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
 * That's your call, • the solemn one, that's what some editors do, sometimes start with CSD, then PROD, then AFD. It's not always appropriate but it happens. Liz Read! Talk! 01:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I thought that, since the article has now been nominated at AFD, it can't be listed for PROD? • the solemn one (talk) 15:38, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * You're right, if an article has been sent to AFD, it can't be PROD'd later because PRODs are for "uncontroversial deletions". A deletion that goes through an AFD deletion discussion is not consider uncontroversial because it requires the participation of editors, the examination of sources, often debate among editors. Liz Read! Talk! 04:59, 16 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.