Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Conjowa: Sequel Na i-Two


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 23:10, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

The Conjowa: Sequel Na i-Two

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable film BOVINEBOY 2008 17:31, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 03:32, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 03:33, 28 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt. I thought I recognized the title. It looks like it's a sequel to The Conjowa, which was deleted a few months ago. Someone kept trying to re-add the article to Wikipedia, making it necessary to salt the article. This is the same editor that repeatedly tried to re-create the article for the first film, so I'm going to be very honest and say that they will probably try to re-create this one at some point in time. I am going to block the editor since his username (User:EricAquinoProd) is a pretty obvious COI username. In any case, salting this now would probably save a lot of time if he does decide to change his username or make a new account. I honestly think he's pretty much here to post about himself. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:50, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * It actually looks like the current user account I just blocked was actually a way of trying to get around the block made with User:JavaBroadCorp. Given that the other account tried to make a wiki page on their talk page, I'm going to block that account a little further. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   17:11, 29 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - same rationale as the first film, a student production lacking coverage in reliable sources. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:08, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * And searches through WP:INDAFD: NADA
 * And searches through WP:INDAFD: NADA
 * And searches through WP:INDAFD: NADA


 * Delete per being at best TOO SOON, and lacking the coverage to meet WP:NFF paragraph 3. The COI issues of the article's author do not help the situation in the least. Allow recreation or undeletion only if or when notability guideline is met.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 05:34, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.