Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Constitutional Monarchy of Scoussia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Snow delete  DGG ( talk ) 05:04, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

The Constitutional Monarchy of Scoussia

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable micronation. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ONEDAY Ryan Vesey  Review me!  02:38, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clearly non-notable; looks like the write-up of some kid's idle daydream. Michaelmas1957 02:52, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete either a daydream or some kid's school project for social studies class. I'd say it's close to being speedy-deleteable as a hoax, as it presents clearly made-up information as fact. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  03:46, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I considered it, but I don't believe that it is deliberately intended to misinform by presenting something false as real. I believe there is a difference on createing an article on a made-up micronation, and making-up a micronation and creating an article for it if you understand what I mean.  The former would be a hoax, while the latter is presenting real information about a non-notable topic that you created. Ryan Vesey  Review me!  03:56, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I would class it as WP:MADEUP, instead of WP:HOAX. However, both warrant speedy deletion.


 * Speedy Delete per WP:MADEUP. I found The Constitutional Monarchy of Scoussia on Nation States, which is a website where you can design a nation the way that you want it.  I found that the website was interesting, but the subject matter has no notability. NJ Wine (talk) 04:13, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Just to metion WP:MADEUP isn't a speedy deletion criteria; however, an admin could always ignore all rules and do it anyways. Ryan Vesey Review me!  04:29, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This article is totally unsourced, and it doesn't seem likely that reliable independent sources will be written about this fictional country. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:16, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, others have already said it all: unverified and WP:MADEUP. — P.T. Aufrette (talk) 05:02, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.