Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cooters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 08:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

The Cooters

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Failure to cite sources. Written as an advertisement. Relevance. DeviantSolution (talk) 05:38, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Unfortunately. It does meet WP:MUSIC as they apparently had 2 albums on the Profane Existence label. Notability is another issue in that, well, not many people I know have ever heard of them and we live here in the band's home state of Mississippi. - &#10032; ALLST☆R &#10032; echo 06:35, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable via releases and coverage.--Michig (talk) 07:16, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Possibly needs to be rewritten, but they have the notability to keep the page. Alberon (talk) 11:10, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep None of the reasons cited above are valid reasons for deletion. The article's already tagged for cleanup. Artist meets WP:MUSIC. Chubbles (talk) 15:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: Passes WP:MUSIC. Schuym1 (talk) 22:37, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:MUSIC because it only has albums and independent labels making the band not notable. Also lack of references. No-one has explained how it passes WP:MUSIC either, this is because it doesn't pass it. Ijanderson (talk) 22:38, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * No one should have to. WP:MUSIC also says "or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable)." Schuym1 (talk) 23:09, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, multiple albums released on Profane Existence easily passes WP:MUSIC.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 22:59, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment having work published on an Independent Label does not pass WP:MUSIC because:
 * they have not had credit for writing or co-writing either lyrics or music for a notable composition.
 * they have not written musical theatre of some sort that was performed in a notable theatre that had a reasonable run as such things are judged in their particular situation and time.
 * they have not had a work used as the basis for a later composition by a songwriter, composer or lyricist who meets the above criteria.
 * they have not written a song or composition which has won in a major music competition not established expressly for newcomers.
 * they have not been listed as a major influence or teacher of a composer, songwriter or lyricist that meets the above criteria.
 * they have not appeared at a reasonable length in standard reference books on his or her genre of music.

Ijanderson (talk) 23:11, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Those are all other criteria. A band needs to meet just one, to pass the guideline.- Mgm|(talk) 10:21, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


 * You are way wrong. All criteria 5 says is "Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable." Schuym1 (talk) 23:13, 27 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.