Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Corbett Report


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:48, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

The Corbett Report

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

YouTube videos by himself and blogs by unknown people do not count as reliable sources by any measure. It is unclear if the RT.com articles were written by Corbett, and they do not show notability per GNG or BIO standards since they are all about topics that are not Corbett himself. Just some guy with a podcast or website that hasn't been noted by reliable sources does not rise to the standard notability levels needed. DreamGuy (talk) 01:53, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Dbrodbeck (talk) 02:20, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Appears to fail WP:WEB. jps (talk) 03:47, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as it stands per nom - David Gerard (talk) 17:05, 10 November 2015 (UTC)


 * He's quite notable, always cites his sources, and has had a following of hundreds of thousands of people.
 * Just because your censorious mainstream media ignores him doesn't make him not notable. 2003:E6:3721:E88D:CA63:14FF:FE70:508E (talk) 06:47, 7 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.