Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Corley Conspiracy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep  due to a vexatious nomination; no reason to take this any further. Non-admin closure. MuZemike ( talk ) 17:27, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

The Corley Conspiracy

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Keep Notable work with requisite coverage. Also interesting (but not a requirement, as it's qualifies on its own) in relation to Mike Corley. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:01, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The AfD Message on that article's page doesn't say why the article should be deleted; there is no nominator's rationale on this page; the article's creator has not been notified. The first two points preclude any meaningful argument against the nomination, the third point might hint at unfamiliarity with Wikipedia processes or mischievousness; all three together suggest WP:SNOW. Michael Bednarek (talk) 02:58, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong and Speedy Keep User:Dweller already took a look at this article's notability when deciding to redirect MI-5 Persecution. There isn't even any deletion argument to raise objections at. MMetro (talk) 08:30, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:50, 26 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.