Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cornell Review


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Speedy keep: actually, based on the sourcing available in the article it is a notable publication, and I have serious doubts about this and other nominations. Drmies (talk) 00:40, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

The Cornell Review

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to be notable based on sourcing. Herp Derp (talk) 22:56, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.