Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Correspondence of the Early Naturalists


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 10:58, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

The Correspondence of the Early Naturalists

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This is pure, uncut WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ bomb  03:10, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The material and sources could be the basis for an expansion of Science communication, though, as long as the author does not draw his own conclusions. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 20:52, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Essay. tedder (talk) 05:47, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, add to user space and suggest that cited contents be added to the specific personalities involved. Shyamal (talk) 06:10, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.