Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cort and Fatboy Show


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete g7, author agreed to deletion, see below. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:34, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

The Cort and Fatboy Show

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Recreation of a speedy deleted article about a show on a local radio station. Fails to credibly demonstrate notability through reliable sources - all the external links are blogs. PROD was removed by creator without improvement. Kudpung (talk) 18:59, 3 February 2011 (UTC)


 * The template said to remove it from the page if I disagreed with it, so I did, along with a note on the talk page regarding why. I apologize. I am further attempting to demonstrate notability, but it's taking some time for find more articles of credibility on my own. Please also do note that the links from oregonlive.com are from The Oregonian themselves, the preeminent newspaper of Oregon. Centrifuze (talk) 19:03, 3 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Do the links to Oregon Live not give it enough credibility to stand as it is yet? Centrifuze (talk) 19:22, 3 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Notability is only inherited from tangential sources. External links are blogs with little/no editorial oversight and therefore not WP:RS Reliable Sources. No cited assertions in the article. Reads like copy from the show's "About Us" section (if it exists) and odd inside joke is off putting. Does not demonstrate anything more than local importance. Hasteur (talk) 19:25, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, a couple of mentions in the local paper aren't enough to make this a notable podcast. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:26, 3 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Fair enough, go ahead and delete it. I've backed up the page, and will resubmit it at a later date once its been better polished. Centrifuze (talk) 19:31, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.