Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Crookes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

The Crookes

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable band, nothing released yet, "debut single" not due out for 5 days, violates WP:CRYSTAL Wuh  Wuz  Dat  13:41, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, easily passes WP:MUSIC. WP:CRYSTAL falls down when we have enough information to write an article, which we do. Coverage by reliable sources here, here and here, two found via google and one actually linked in the article. This band easily passes WP:MUSIC, and the AfD should be snow kept. Ironholds (talk) 13:57, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 16:29, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 16:29, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'd say the attention from NME and 6Music between them is enough. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 17:19, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Coverage by BBC and NME meets the bar (albeit just barely) of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Yilloslime T C  21:25, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, passes WP:MUSICBIO.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 23:36, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.