Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Crusader (publication)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Xavier_University_–_Ateneo_de_Cagayan and delete history per consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:53, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

The Crusader (publication)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Student newspaper. No evidence that it is notable outside its university. &mdash; RHaworth 10:43, 28 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment - Is mentioned in Xavier University – Ateneo de Cagayan, which is probably more than enough. MakeSense64 (talk) 11:04, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 12:14, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 30 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:37, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Delete - I cannot find any independent, secondary sources that discuss this journal in any significant way. All Google hits are either the journal's own website, or WP itself, or Facebook.  Nothing in Google books, either, which normally would be "so what" except that this journal is 76 (!) years old, so some book would  have discussed the journal by now if it were notable. --Noleander (talk) 22:23, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   Wifione    .......  Leave a message  03:20, 11 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete not intended but once again came up with the same results as Noleander. Its existence has been around for more than enough time that if it was truly "notable" than it would/should be easy to find other secondary sources. tyvm Pudge MclameO (talk) 04:10, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.