Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cuddles Show


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 08:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

The Cuddles Show

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Author deleted my prod without addressing my concerns: This is a cable access show in a small city/large town that may get no more than a few thousand viewers if that. But we don't know if it even gets that much. Vanity page and/or fan page. Postcard Cathy 21:24, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Public access is last generation's YouTube. "Widespread" is in quotes, so it's apparent there's not much coverage at all. DarkAudit 22:45, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as it lacks reliable independent secondary sources, thus failing WP:N. Google search for "The Cuddles Show" gives only 8 links, none leading to "independent" results.  There are no hits on Google News or Google News Archive.  ikh (talk) 21:53, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete because I did address the concers these people had, I already defended my arguement, this is not an advertisement, and last I checked, what you think the show's viewerbase is doesn't justify it being removed.Thecuddmancometh 20:09, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I am sure you added this article in good faith, however, I still have a concern regarding the shows notability. Take a close look at WP:N, esp. the part about reliable independent secondary sources.  I could not find any online, nor hint of any (see my "delete" opinion above).  If you know of any (especially if the "show has received widespread acclaim and mention local newspapers"), it would be very nice if they would be added to the article.  If you manage to find them and add them to the article, I would be willing to change my vote. ikh (talk) 00:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I added an article from a newspaper in "external links" Thecuddmancometh 12:56, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: You sourced one article in a local newspaper with limited circulation. That hardly equals widespread acclaim.  Postcard Cathy 16:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - insufficient reliable sources. A single local paper article isn't enough.   -- Whpq 16:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete -non-notable... for now. Good luck and maybe some day.... Sethie 05:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.