Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Curse Chronicles Series


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 01:37, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

The Curse Chronicles Series

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Additional related articles also nominated for deletion:

Non-notable book series by a non-notable author. All books self-published. Contested PROD.

As a matter of disclosure, I did speedy delete the author's biography article at Shahryar Niazi per WP:CSD before the proposed deletions. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:32, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * delete clearly not notable but I admire the young contributor's pluck Zad68 (talk) 23:52, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 28 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete all related pages. Self-published books that fail to establish any kind of notability.  There are no WP:RS to be found, as the only places that make mention of the books are first party sources.  Rorshacma (talk) 18:30, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's nothing here to show that the author has achieved any notability or that the series has either. I will mention that it might be worthwhile to salt these articles since the original editor has attempted to re-add an article about the author twice. Hopefully he or she won't try to readd the article until the series/author has notability, but that they tried to add the author twice in about 3 months tells me that they might try to re-add articles again in the future. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:07, 29 February 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.