Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Curse of Davros (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. The Wordsmith Talk to me 22:08, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

The Curse of Davros
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Lack of significant coverage and failing to meet general notability guidelines. Previous AFD discussion did not sufficiently determine notability. There is a lack of reliable sources for this article online. Existing references do not determine notability. List reference to this article is at Doctor Who: The Monthly Adventures. Torpedoi (talk) 21:42, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Radio. Torpedoi (talk) 21:42, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:28, 29 November 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm looking up sources to see if we can get notability on this one, but British audio drama is a bit outside of my usual wheelhouse. I'll post the sources here for everyone's perusal. I'll start with reviews of the program: Unreality SF looks either RS or acceptable SPS given the author's credentials. Time Scales. Doc Oho Reviews looks like a blog. Winter Is Coming. Sci-Fi Online looks commercial. Sci-Fi Bulletin looks like it has potential. Darkfrog24 (talk) 20:09, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep (very weak): meets GNG, .  // Timothy :: talk  13:53, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - Based on the additional sources provided during the discussion, "The Curse of Davros" appears to meet the general notability guideline (WP:GNG). The sources cited, such as reviews from Unreality SF and Sci-Fi Online, suggest that there is significant coverage in reliable publications that are independent of the subject. the presence of multiple sources that provide independent reviews and coverage of the audio drama indicates that the topic has received enough attention to satisfy Wikipedia's notability criteria for creative works.
 * PD Slessor (talk) 10:19, 13 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep Meets WP:GNG with sources presented above. They're reliable and in-depth enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 06:46, 9 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.