Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Curse of King Tut's Tomb (2006 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 16:16, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

The Curse of King Tut's Tomb (2006 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable television film, lacking significant coverage by independent sources per WP:NF BOVINEBOY 2008 23:11, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Withdrawn by nominator New information has been presented by multiple editors that has established the notability of the film. BOVINEBOY 2008 14:08, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:31, 2 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment: Do any editors here know if Something Awful (somethingawful.com) could be considered reliable here? Their review (published in part 1 and part 2) appears to be serious but presented in a comedic way, and it almost reads like a blog post. If that is usable, I also have a review from CineMagazine (in Dutch), which I have seen used as a source here before; thus, maybe establishing notability per NFILM with two reviews. LunaEatsTuna (talk) 04:09, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I believe that in the past they've been considered a RS as far as reviews go when they're posted as an official review (rather than just a forum post), but to be honest I haven't used them as a source in years, mostly because they don't seem to really do film reviews anymore. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:08, 3 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. I found a bonanza of coverage via newspapers to help establish notability. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  14:39, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per the reviews found above and coverage from ReaderofthePack (or the erstwhile Tokyogirl79). LunaEatsTuna (talk) 18:36, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep IMDb lists 12 reviews (it says 13, but one of the reviews is in two parts and is therefore counted twice): . I don't think all of them count for establishing notability, but enough of them do for the film to pass our notability requirements. TompaDompa (talk) 23:11, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:NFILM per above.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:21, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:NFILM is clearly met here Yaxı Hökmdarz (talk) 05:56, 9 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.