Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Daily Grind


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy deleted. Created by a banned user while they were banned. -- Longhair\talk 10:23, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

The Daily Grind

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable website, no reliable secondary sources (references are also dubious). Doesn't comply with WP:WEB. Also created by banned sockpuppet User:ChampagneComedy. Finally, issues with conflict of interest, as sockpuppeteer was User:Joestella, who is involved with the site. Recurring dreams 11:24, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   —Recurring dreams 11:26, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 15:04, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Nominator hit the nail right on the head Rackabello 16:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails 2 of the 3 notability requirements at WP:WEB - content is not the subject of multiple non-trivial published works other than the webpage itself, and has not won a well-known and independent award. All but one of the references are unrelated to and do not mention The Daily Grind. The remaining reference (to an archive at watercoolergames) is a dead link so I couldn't verify it. The Tharunka reference in the body of the text is genuine but self-referential - the editor of The Daily Grind was at the time also the editor of Tharunka and published his own work in both sources (and so is not independent coverage). Euryalus 23:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Twenty Years 09:49, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.