Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Daily Newsletter (second nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:21, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

The Daily Newsletter
Previously deleted as non-notable, per previous discussion. The content that was submitted recently does not constitute a speedy for recreating original content, but I felt the article still needed to be put on AfD. However, since I was the admin to originally delete the article, I don't think it's good for conflict-of-interest reasons to put in an opinion, so I abstain. Mo0 [ talk ] 03:17, 28 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete a monthly "newspaper" hosted by geocities whose name is "daily newsletter". Arbusto 03:19, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Makes no assertion of importance or notability. Hosted at Geocities, so it probably has none. "Sent out using WordPad software." Is that some strange way of saying it was a text file sent as an email attachment? eaolson 03:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Why not advertise in The Daily Newsletter? With a circulation of over 6 people, it's an opportunity you'd be a fool to miss! But that's not all! The Daily Newsletter now boasts: all-editorial content, to avoid truth-clutter; 3 pages instead of 1, for greater word-use; state-of-the-art word processing technology, to conserve crayons and a bright and breezy A4 format, for ease of photocopying. -- IslaySolomon 05:40, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per all the above comments. As the nominatior of the first AfD discussion, I had requested a comparison to deleted content; the result being this second nomination.--Gay Cdn  (talk) (email) (Contr.) 11:11, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - boring I know but for all the above reasons Nigel (Talk) 12:08, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete ... *blinks*. No establishment of notability, at all, reads like a blog and there's even a request to redirect it to the user's talk page (which has pricing information!). Good grief, that's gotta take some pluck. I'd suggest the creator concentrates on getting a proper website set up, a proper web-address and concentrates on getting some good writing done. The promotion will happen in time but WP is not for airing everyone's pet projects. WP:NN Spamcruftvertisement. QuagmireDog 11:42, 29 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep (in my opinion) Look, you guys:
 * Why don't you READ the newsletter before deleting it!
 * If the Daily Newsletter EVER becomes popular, you'll regret doing this!!
 * Juwiki September 29, 2006 7:06 PM UTC
 * (1) I would, but it's not online. (2) That's when it would deserve a Wikipedia article. Until then, it's just a blog by email. eaolson 00:30, 30 September 2006 (UTC)


 * post by Juwiki confirms my vote as it says effectively that it is not yet popular despite the ad on the user page Nigel (Talk) 07:16, 30 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I could send you a FREE edition, or maybe you should look at my Userpage again...

User:Juwiki: September 30th, 2006 8:28 AM CT


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.